Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $169.99 vs $469.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900KF - $0.81 vs $1.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-2120 - 294 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
209
71%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2890 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
50%
Price, $
$469.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2890 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |