Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4705 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $169.99 vs $529.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-14900F - $0.97 vs $2.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Stray than Core i3-2120 - 190 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
176
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10422 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
34%
Price, $
$529.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |