Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1826 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-9400F - 216 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $96.0 vs $529.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - $0.55 vs $2.45 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
22%
Price, $
$529.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13788 minutes ago
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13789 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |