Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 45% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G1620 - 240 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
17.954345917471468%
Multi-Core
723
9.33987856866038%
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
