Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $109.99 vs $147.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-13100 - $0.74 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |