Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $120.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-12900F - $0.9 vs $2.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10320 - 150 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4188 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.89/FPS
31%
Price, $
$432.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |