Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 972 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Core i9-7940X - 201 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $120.0 vs $397.83
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-7940X - $0.6 vs $2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 28 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4656 minutes ago
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4657 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |