Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $139.99 vs $317.22
- Up to 51% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-14700F - $1.14 vs $2.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 10% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10320 - 135 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 28 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
91.11111111111111%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
48.51063829787233%
Price, $
$317.22
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
55.45945945945946%
Multi-Core
4626
26.69051465497346%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |