Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $139.99 vs $436.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-14900KF - $0.47 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-10320 - 340 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
297
87.3529411764706%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
340
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
36.71874999999999%
Price, $
$436
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $436 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
49.51737451737452%
Multi-Core
4626
21.984602224123183%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |