Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $120.0 vs $511.77
- Up to 68% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-14900KF - $0.6 vs $1.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 37% better in Rust than Core i3-10320 - 276 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
32%
Price, $
$511.77
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $511.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |