Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $120.0 vs $469.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-13900KF - $0.4 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-10320 - 336 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4787 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
336
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
28%
Price, $
$469.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4787 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |