Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2803 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 42% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 61 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $52.02 vs $90.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74725 minutes ago
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |