Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4460 - 110 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $64.04 vs $199.06
- Up to 65% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10300 - $0.63 vs $1.81 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
34%
Price, $
$199.06
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10127 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
101
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |