Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i3-10105

3.7 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i3-10105 Logo
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack

Buy for $84.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

3.5 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache

Buy for $225.1 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i3-10105

3.7 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i3-10105 Logo
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack

Buy for $84.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

3.5 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache

Buy for $225.1 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105

  • Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 235 vs 233 FPS
  • Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $84.95 vs $225.1
  • Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 24 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Tom Clancy’s The Division 2.
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2

Tom Clancy’s The Division 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i3-10105 Logo
Core i3-10105

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

235

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$84.95

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack

Buy for $84.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018


FPS

233

99.14893617021276%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$225.1

37%

AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache

Buy for $225.1 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i3-10105 Logo
Core i3-10105

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i3-10105 Logo
Core i3-10105

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

1487

100%

Multi-Core

4609

61.83257311510598%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

1274

85.67585743106928%

Multi-Core

7454

100%

Intel Core i3-10105

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Mar 16th, 2021
Release DateOct 3rd, 2018
Core i3CollectionRyzen Threadripper
Comet LakeCodenameColfax
Intel Socket 1200SocketAMD Socket SP3r2
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
12
8Threads
24
3.7 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed4.3 GHz
65 W
TDP180 W
14 nmProcess Size
12 nm
37.0x
Multiplier35.0x
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.