Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G4900 - 175 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $68.02 vs $93.74
- Up to 20% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-10100 - $0.43 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1317 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |