Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3869 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $19.59 vs $435.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900F - $0.15 vs $2.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G550 - 148 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 32 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
127
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11572 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11583 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |