Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2592 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $19.59 vs $395.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.13 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G550 - 182 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 24 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
150
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |