Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 375 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 93% cheaper than FX-9590 - $19.59 vs $298.02
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G550 - 190 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76528 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
70.77205882352942%
Multi-Core
629
28.972823583602025%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |