Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4238 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $49.0 vs $528.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900F - $0.55 vs $3.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 54% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G550 - 137 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 32 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |