Buy on Amazon
$53.55
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 1757 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 72% cheaper than FX-9370 - $53.55 vs $191.43
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 54 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G4900 - 180 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75499 minutes ago
AMD FX-9370 Octa-core (8 Core) 4.40 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+Retail Pack
Buy for $191.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75499 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
