Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 694 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $75.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76008 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
73.82671480144406%
Multi-Core
723
44.99066583696328%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |