Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 315 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 17 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 32% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron 847 - 78 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |