Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 177 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 20% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron 3865U - 103 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 64 vs 2 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
