Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 848 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Celeron 3865U - 225 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
