Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 924 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 3205U - 131 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$556.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $556.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |