Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1887 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron 3205U - 223 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 20 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |