Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 1036 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 15 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 3205U - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$335
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |