Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1514 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Celeron 3205U - 278 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |