Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 461 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i7-9700F - 281 vs 278 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $286.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-9700F - $1.02 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$286
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |