Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2207 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Celeron 3205U - 213 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |