Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 1589 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 23% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron 3205U - 118 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |