Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1589 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Rocket League than Celeron 3205U - 731 vs 666 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
731
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2350 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |