Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 1969 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron 3205U - 111 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$345.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $345.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Renoir |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |