Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 2876 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 15% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron 3205U - 204 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
