Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 18% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 228 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raphael | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
