Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 893 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 3205U - 526 vs 499 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
526
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |