Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1397 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron 2955U - 160 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 64 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Haswell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
