Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 372 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 15 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Celeron 2955U - 265 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
