Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2096 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 20% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-3930K - 115 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $195.0 vs $493.91
- Up to 53% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.03 vs $4.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.29/FPS
47%
Price, $
$493.91
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $493.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |