Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $195.0 vs $460.74
- Up to 3% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900K - $0.76 vs $0.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 129% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3930K - 587 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
256
43%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
587
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
97%
Price, $
$460.74
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $460.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |