Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $221.76 vs $294.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14600KF - $1.75 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14600KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 158 vs 127 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
127
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3752 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
93%
Price, $
$294.99
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |