Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G4900 - 230 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $53.55 vs $261.0
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $261 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
207
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
28.269848554382744%
Multi-Core
1051
8.844567870066482%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |