Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800 is 2962 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1620 - 163 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |