Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1112 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 27% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 128 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $7.99 vs $205.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.08 vs $1.6 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
101
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$7.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $7.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |