Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 1758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - $7.99 vs $117.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 5600G - $0.05 vs $0.63 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $117 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
168
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$7.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $7.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cezanne | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |