Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2399 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 11% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 339 vs 306 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $199.0 vs $232.12
- Up to 22% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.59 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
339
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |