Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 2114 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 175 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $83.47 vs $232.12
- Up to 66% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.48 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $83.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5500 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |