Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 183 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $82.02 vs $89.5
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $89.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74289 minutes ago
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |