Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $85.76 vs $469.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900KF - $0.58 vs $2.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2600 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
149
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
20%
Price, $
$469.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |