Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10105F - 231 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $83.15 vs $487.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KF - $0.41 vs $2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $487 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $83.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |