Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6600 - 222 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $79.0 vs $469.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - $0.43 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
20%
Price, $
$469.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13522 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |